New York City, July 30, 2025 – A dramatic new chapter has unfolded in the long‑running paternity saga surrounding Jay‑Z, as Matthew Knowles, Beyoncé’s father, has appeared publicly to support calls for a DNA test to determine if Rymir Satterthwaite—who claims to be Jay‑Z’s secret eldest son—is in fact his biological child.
This explosive development comes after more than a decade of legal setbacks and denials by Jay‑Z’s team. Rymir, age 31, insists he is the result of an alleged relationship between his late mother, Wanda, and Jay‑Z in the early 1990s, when she was reportedly only 16 and Jay‑Z was about 22 .
Who Is Rymir Satterthwaite? “I Want the Truth, Not Money”
Rymir Satterthwaite first emerged publicly in 2015, claiming to be Jay‑Z’s biological son. Since he was 21, he has pursued legal recognition, emphasizing that he seeks acknowledgment, not cash or celebrity
In interviews, Rymir has made clear: “I don’t want money… I just want him to finally tell the truth to the world.” He argues that the courts have consistently obstructed his right to a paternity test and due process
A Decade of Legal Battles—Court Dismissals and Jurisdictional Hurdles
Beginning in 2010, Rymir’s mother filed a paternity suit in Pennsylvania, but procedural missteps and his age at the time meant the claim was dismissed. He was over 18, and Pennsylvania law requires paternity to be established by then. The case shifted to New Jersey court jurisdiction, where Jay‑Z’s team argued he lacked residency or property ties, leading to repeated dismissals and appeals
In 2023, Rymir took his struggle to the New Jersey Supreme Court, seeking to unseal documents and compel a DNA test—yet his motion was denied. The case later advanced to the Appellate Division, where it remains under review
Jay‑Z’s Denials: “Fabricated Allegations,” “Frivolous Lawsuits”
Jay‑Z’s representatives have consistently denied the paternity claims. In a 2025 response, his legal team described Rymir’s lawsuit as another episode of “harassment” and repeating false claims “refuted by multiple courts.” They noted a prior legal injunction barring related lawsuits without court permission, and said Rymir’s mother had listed another man on the birth certificate in 1993
They also argued that Jay‑Z’s lack of formal residency in New Jersey meant no court could enforce a DNA test—though critics question the strength of this technicality given his public property history
Rymir’s Claims of Harassment, Judicial Misconduct & Financial Loss
Rymir and his godmother, Dr. Lillie Coley, have submitted lawsuits against New Jersey judges and court officials, alleging judicial bias, fraud, sealed courtroom records, and illegal liens on their home. They claim the battle has cost them over $100,000 in legal fees, destabilized their lives—including threats and harassment—and blocked their access to justice
Rymir also asserts they were surveilled and even faced threats of violence—accusations his legal team says are unverified but reflect deep frustration and trauma over the unresolved claim
Matthew Knowles Steps In: A Bold New Backer
In a surprising twist, Matthew Knowles, Beyoncé’s father and Beyoncé’s longtime manager, has stepped forward in support of Rymir’s right to a DNA test. Though not a legal party, he has publicly expressed solidarity with the pursuit of truth, raising the stakes in this disputed narrative. Knowles—known for fiercely protecting his daughter’s image—seemed to signal that establishing clarity is now a matter of fairness and personal integrity.
While not a formal litigant, Knowles’ support gives Rymir increased visibility and pressure, signaling that the case may attract more attention and legal scrutiny moving forward.
Social Media and Public Reactions: “He Looks Like Jay‑Z”
Online commentary and social media buzz bolster the debate. On Reddit, users noted facial resemblances between Rymir and Jay‑Z, pointing to strong genes:
“He looks a lot like Jay’s siblings, Eric and Michelle,” and
“He was probably conceived by Jay‑Z when his mom was 16”
Another Redditor comment highlights the legal discomfort:
“Taking the test would confirm he slept with her when she was 16”
These reactions reflect both support for Rymir’s quest and criticism of Jay‑Z’s avoidance of DNA confirmation.
Legal Stakes and Ethical Questions
At issue is more than paternity—it’s about access to due process, court fairness, and public accountability. Legal experts note that while Jay‑Z remains legally cleared in court rulings, blocking a DNA test after so many years raises concerns that go beyond the merits of Rymir’s claim
Supporters argue that paternity tests are straightforward, yet Jay‑Z’s attorneys have resisted—citing jurisdiction and previous legal closures. The longer the claim remains unresolved, the more symbolic it becomes: a test could either validate or definitively close this chapter.
What’s Next: Pending Appeals and Public Pressure
New Jersey Appellate Division: The current appeal may determine whether the case can proceed or remains blocked under the 2022 injunction and prior dismissals.
Public Pressure: With Matthew Knowles’ support, media and reputational risk grows for Jay‑Z if the issue remains unresolved.
Potential DNA Agreement: Even absent legal compulsion, Jay‑Z may face mounting calls to privately undergo a test to settle the public debate.
Ongoing Disclosure Movements: Rymir continues requesting unsealing of 2012–2016 court records to shed light on sealed processes and judicial rulings.
Conclusion: A Saga of Power, Secrecy, and Identity
The headline—“Matthew Knowles DEMANDS Jay Z DNA Test | Rymir Is First Son”—captures a seismic shift: the involvement of Beyoncé’s father brings not only emotional weight, but renewed legitimacy to a decades-long refusal to test.
Whether Jay‑Z submits to a DNA test—or continues to legally balk—the court of public opinion is now watching closer than ever. Rymir seeks recognition, not riches; Matthew Knowles seeks clarity and justice; and Jay‑Z, yet again, faces unrelenting questions about legacy, fame, and the responsibilities of truth.
With Rymir’s case still pending appeal, and court documents sealed from previous litigation, the truth remains tantalizingly out of reach. But one thing is clear: the demand for a DNA test with Matthew Knowles’ backing has reopened a battle many believed was quietly settled—and now public scrutiny has reignited.