Former Partner Claims Stefon Diggs Used Cardi B to “Clean Up His Image” — “He Never Really Loved Her, Just Wanted More Fame”

In a bombshell allegation circulating recently, a woman claiming to be Stefon Diggs’ ex says the NFL star intentionally used his relationship with Cardi B as a vehicle to “wash away” negative press and polish his public persona. She asserts that Diggs never truly loved Cardi B, but entered into the relationship for personal gain — to raise his status and exploit her star power.

The Allegation: Strategy Over Sincerity

According to the anonymous allegation, Diggs viewed dating Cardi B not as the result of genuine emotional connection but as a strategic move. The claim goes deeper:

• She accuses Diggs of calculating the relationship for optics, not for love.
• He allegedly sought to associate with Cardi’s celebrity to overshadow his controversies and re-frame his public image.
• The ex claims he never made substantive emotional investment in Cardi; he treated her more as a brand asset.

If true, such behavior would shift public perception of the Diggs–Cardi B romance from one of romantic development to a publicity campaign with a human face.

Already a Landscape of Legal and Personal Turmoil

This accusation lands amid a swirl of controversies that have dogged Diggs in recent months, providing fertile ground for public speculation. Some of the relevant context:

• Lawsuit from Ex Mulan Hernandez
  Diggs currently faces a lawsuit from ex-girlfriend Mulan Hernandez, who accuses him of assault and attempting to silence her with a non-disclosure agreement. Page Six+1
• Paternity Dispute with Lord Gisselle
  In a separate legal case, Diggs is alleged to have fathered a daughter in April 2025 with model Aileen Lopera (aka “Lord Gisselle”). She is seeking to establish paternity and physical and legal custody. E! Online
• Relationship with Cardi B & Pregnancy
  Diggs and Cardi B publicly confirmed their relationship in June 2025, after months of speculation. People.com+2CBS News+2 Cardi B later revealed she was pregnant with their child, her fourth and his first with her. CBS News+1
• Social Media Removal and Breakup Rumors
  In mid-2025, Cardi B removed all photos of Diggs from her Instagram grid, which sparked wide public rumors of a breakup. Yahoo+3New York Post+3On3+3 Diggs responded by posting video of them working out together, attempting to quell speculation. HOT 97+1
• Public Gestures Amid Scandal
  Despite these tensions, Diggs made a dramatic appearance at Cardi B’s album release party, surprising her with a grand bouquet of roses amid the legal storms. Page Six

Given this litany of legal, relational, and reputational drama, the new allegation frames the Diggs-Cardi B relationship in an even more cynical light: not as romance but as a press-management tactic.

Assessing Credibility & Motive

As with any high-stakes claim, observers will look for corroboration. Some key questions and counterpoints arise:

1. Is this a strategic “revenge” allegation?
   Public allegations of this nature often emerge from bitterness or a desire for attention or leverage. Without texts, witnesses, audio, or financial records, motive becomes a critical factor.
2. Timing matters.
   The accusation surfaces amid Diggs’ existing legal entanglements and widespread media scrutiny. Critics may argue the claim is opportunistic — intended to gain traction while he is vulnerable.
3. Public statements so far.
   As of now, Diggs has not publicly addressed the specific accusation that he used Cardi B for publicity. He has denied other rumors (for example, refuting a claim about Cardi B’s “BBL smell”) by simply replying “Cap.” HotNewHipHop
4. Cardi B’s silence or response.
   Cardi B, who has her own reputation and career to protect, has been largely silent on many controversies involving Diggs. She posted cryptic messages amid the legal blowups but has not explicitly addressed the “image laundering” claim. The Times of India
5. Public dynamics & media appetite.
   The public loves a scandal involving a star couple. Media outlets often amplify sensational narratives, especially ones about betrayal or manipulation. That dynamic can distort how stories are presented and consumed.

Implications for All Parties Involved

If the allegation gains traction, it could affect the reputations and careers of several parties:

• Stefon Diggs would face renewed scrutiny of his character, both as a public figure and as a partner. If proven, it would damage his credibility and raise questions about his relationships in general.
• Cardi B could find herself portrayed as either an innocent party or as an accomplice in a publicity maneuver, depending on how the narrative evolves. Her legacy and brand may be affected by whichever version of the story the public embraces.
• The accuser would need to survive intense counterattack — from defamation claims, media pressure, and legal risk. Her credibility will become the battleground.
• Fans and media may become increasingly skeptical of celebrity relationships, viewing them as curated narratives rather than organic connections.

How the Story Could Evolve

To turn this allegation into an accepted narrative, a few key developments would likely need to occur:

• Release of proof: The ex would ideally present evidence — text messages, emails, social media history, witnesses, or financial transactions that tie Diggs to strategic image control.
• Legal action: A defamation suit or countersuit could emerge. Diggs might demand proof or bring a libel case if the claims are demonstrably false.
• Mainstream media picking it up: If credible outlets begin investigating, the allegation may transcend social media gossip and gain seriousness in the press.
• Public response from Diggs/Cardi: Either party may choose to address the claim directly — through interviews, statements, or legal filings — shifting control of the narrative.
• Long-term effects on their relationship: Whether the claim is true or not, the mere existence of such allegations may erode trust among the public, fans, and even between Diggs and Cardi.

A Cautious Conclusion

At present, this is an unverified claim — dramatic and sensational, but lacking public proof (at least as of now). But in the world of celebrity, perception often carries as much weight as fact. Even raised anonymously, a claim of using someone for “image laundering” taps into deep public cynicism about love, authenticity, and manipulation in the spotlight.

Whether or not the allegation is true, it adds another dimension of intrigue to an already fraught public narrative. For now:

• Skeptics and fans alike should watch for corroborative evidence.
• Media outlets should exercise caution, verifying before amplifying.
• Diggs and Cardi face a delicate dance — distance themselves, deny, ignore, or confront — each choice carrying reputation risks.